Mechanical behavior of hot extruded aluminum 6082 chip

In a bid to address the energy-intensive nature of primary aluminum production, this study explores the solid-state recycling of aluminum alloy 6082 chips through direct hot extrusion. Compacted at room temperature, chips were extruded at temperatures (350, 425, and 500 °C) and reduction ratios (6, 8.5, and 11) to optimize mechanical properties. Extensive analyses, including ANOVA and linear regressions, of strength, density, and microstructure revealed significant influences of those extrusion parameters. Optimizing these parameters within the study's aforementioned working ranges can impact the recycled material's strength; with a 36% reduction ratio increase and 20% temperature increase modestly reducing ultimate strength (2%), while a 20% temperature increase alone lowers yield strength more noticeably (9%). These findings highlight the potential for enhanced recycling and sustainable manufacturing.

extrusion and rolling of AC4CH chips.Güley et al. 2 explored the impact of die design on welding quality during hot extrusion of AA6060 chips, providing valuable guidance for process control.Research on process optimization has yielded promising results for various aluminum alloys.Zuo et al. 7 pinpointed 400 °C as the optimal extrusion temperature for AA6063, while Zhang et al. 8 identified 250 °C as the ideal preheating temperature for AA5083.Wagdy 9 validated an eco-friendly hot extrusion method for AA2011 using statistical analysis, aligning with sustainability goals.Explorations of alternative techniques have also shown potential.El-Habbas et al. 10 proposed a two-step approach combining hot extrusion with equal channel angular pressing (ECAP), demonstrating effective microstructure refinement and property enhancement.While studies on other alloys can offer valuable insights, Jian-Yih Wang et al. 11 investigated solid-state recycling of Magnesium Alloy AZ91D through hot extrusion, providing a broader understanding of the process's applicability across materials.Collectively, these studies underscore the importance of parameter optimization, process tailoring, and innovative techniques in advancing solid-state recycling of aluminum alloys.
This paper aims to advance the understanding of the hot extrusion process for recycling chips of aluminum alloy 6082 and investigate its mechanical behavior, building upon previous research findings.The investigation of the mechanical behavior of recycled aluminum alloy 6082 holds significant potential for developing energyefficient and sustainable recycling processes, which align with environmentally friendly manufacturing practices.
After conducting a thorough review of several published papers 1,2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11] , it was found that a number of parameters had been studied and correlated with the properties of recycled materials.However, it was also found that the interaction between extrusion temperature and extrusion reduction ratio and its impact on the mechanical behavior of solid-state recycled samples in comparison to conventionally recycled ones have been rarely explored.In light of this gap in the literature, this study has chosen to focus on aluminum alloy 6082 chips and employ direct hot extrusion as the recycling method.
The selection of Aluminum 6082 as the alloy for this study was made due to its widespread commercial availability and the diverse range of applications it can be used for.This alloy is commonly used in a variety of industries, such as construction, transportation, and manufacturing.Additionally, it is relatively easy to obtain and thus was deemed a practical choice for this research.Furthermore, Aluminum 6082 has a good combination of properties such as strength, corrosion resistance, weldability and machinability, so it's a suitable candidate for many engineering applications.
The primary emphasis of this research will be on investigating the combined influence of extrusion temperature and ratio, as both parameters play crucial roles in determining the mechanical properties of the recycled aluminum alloy.By examining these aspects simultaneously, this study aims to contribute valuable insights into optimizing the hot extrusion process for efficient and effective recycling of aluminum alloy 6082 chips.

Methodology Materials
The raw material used for chip formation in this study was an Aluminum 6082 hollow stock with inner diameter of 25 mm and outer diameter of 50mm.It was purchased from a local supplier, and the chemical composition of the material was found to be as indicated in Table 1.

Chip formation
According to the ASM "American Society for Metals" Handbook 13 , Aluminum alloy 6082 has a machinability rating of C.This rating suggests using High-speed steel turning tools with tool angles and at cutting parameters indicated in Table 2.

Compaction
For the compaction process, a die and die container, shown in Fig. 2C, were designed and manufactured for both purposes of compaction and later hot extrusion process.The material selected for the manufacturing of the die and container was high-chrome tool steel.
For this study's purposes, nine billets have been compacted at room temperature; each representing a unique combination of extrusion variable levels.The average weight, diameter, and height of these billets are approximately 125 g, 38.2 mm, and 46 mm, respectively.Additionally, the dashed lines visible in Fig. 2B represent the radial seams on the exterior, which are indicative of the incremental addition and compaction process used to achieve the final height of the billet.

Extrusion
The type of metal formation process selected for the purpose of aluminum chip solid-state recycling was direct hot extrusion; shown in Fig. 3A.As previously stated, it was determined to vary two critical process parameters that significantly impact the final product's quality: the extrusion working temperature and the extrudate crosssectional reduction ratio.Each parameter was explored at three different points, resulting in a 3 × 3 matrix of potential combinations (refer to Table 3), hence the amount compacted billets.The 6082 aluminum alloy has a melting temperature of 585 °C, and the recrystallization temperature of aluminum alloys may vary from 340 to 400 °C, so it was decided that the three points of work for the extrusion temperature parameter will be 350 °C, 500 °C, and their average value; 425 °C.
Knowing that as the reduction ratio increases, the area of the die cross-section decreases, leading to an increase in the force required to push the billet through the die.Another constraint to be faced was the direct relationship between the reduction ratio and the extrudate length.Considering these facts, while taking the capacity of the hydraulic press on hand, it was decided that the maximum ratio to work at will be 11, minimum ratio will be 6, and the third point will be their average value which is 8.5.
A prevalent issue known as "die swell" was discovered at the tip of the extrudate.This defect arises from the elastic properties of the extruded material, which causes it to return to its original shape and cross-section as it exits the die.Die swell can be triggered by insufficient lubrication or excessive friction between the extrudate's surface and the die opening, resulting in surface irregularities.
While die swell is more commonly associated with polymer extrusion, it was also observed during the experiment of this study due to the elevated temperatures, relatively high reduction ratios, and lack of lubrication in the extrusion process.The presence of remnant voids between the material's particles from the compaction process likely contributed to this defect, resulting in a distinct flower-like appearance, as shown in Fig. 4B.Another possible reason to why this phenomenon occurred lack of shear action at extrudate tip at the beginning of the extrusion process.
Another common extrusion defect encountered during this study is extrusion piping or funneling, depicted in Fig. 4A.This issue is believed to have occurred due to overshooting the extrusion press ram displacement, neglecting the preset 1-cm safety distance.This oversight led to the extrusion of all the designated material inside the container, leaving behind no dead-metal zone, and posing a risk of damaging both the punch and extrusion die.

Tensile samples making
Tensile specimens have been manufactured from the recycled extrudates on a center lathe turning machine according to ASTM E8/E8M.Figure 5 shows that each extrudate was divided into three sections; A, B and C, yielding three tensile specimens per extrudate.Each specimen was given a code (i.e.3B), indicating the original extrudate, and the specimens position along the extrudate.The parent material hollow stock has also undergone work to make tensile specimens for testing under the same conditions the recycled specimens went through.

Tensile test
After performing the test on all the specimens; 0A through 10C, using a universal Testing machine (Lloyd-300 kN), at a constant crosshead speed 2mm/min, a stress/strain curve is drawn for each specimen using 200 measured points (Tracking load, elongation, stress and percentage Strain).Strain was calculated by tracking the testing machine's crosshead displacement and dividing the value by the specimen's original gauge length.www.nature.com/scientificreports/Density After conducting tensile testing on dog-bone specimens representing various extrusion conditions and sections of the extrudate rod, it was necessary to record the density of the specimens in order to assess variations and correlate them with the parameters being studied.This analysis was performed by hydrostatic weighing method using an analytical balance density determination kit (Adam Equipment PW 254-Max.Capacity: 250 g, Resolution: 0.0001 g).

Microstructure
Another way to compare between the parent material alloy and the recycled one is to study their microstructural properties; such as grain size and shape, grain boundaries intensity and percentage of voids.In order to conduct such comparison, the specimens had to be studied metallographically.In order to conduct that procedure, the metallographic mounts had to be immersed in electropolishing and/or microetching solutions first.Metallographic electropolishing is a process that uses electrical current to remove surface material and create a highly polished surface.Microetching is a chemical process used to selectively dissolve or remove certain regions of a metal sample, revealing the microstructure.It can be used to reveal specific microstructural features, such as grain boundaries, phases, and defects.The specifications for both processes are shown in Table 4.

Results
In Figs. 6 and 7, the error bars per each bin on the histogram represent the variation between the mechanical properties (yield and ultimate strengths and strains, respectively) measured at zones A, B and C on each extrudate.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
This analysis section focuses on the influence of extrusion parameters on the mechanical properties of the recycled material.A full factorial design with three levels of reduction ratio and three levels of extrusion temperature was implemented.Individual and interaction effects between these two parameters on the recycled material's mechanical properties were evaluated using a two-way ANOVA model with interaction terms.Statistical significance was determined through F-tests comparing mean square ratios (MSRs) of rows, columns, and interactions Table 4. Specifications of the metallographic electropolishing and microetching processes.www.nature.com/scientificreports/with the F-critical value at 95% confidence.Additionally, P-values of each F-statistic was calculated to provide further insight on the observed effect is likely to be real (p < 0.05) or due to chance.

Standard
Based on the information presented in Fig. 6A and Table 5, it can be inferred with 95% confidence that the yield strength of the extruded material is notably influenced by the extrusion temperature (p < 0.05).However, the extrusion reduction ratio has a non-significant individual effect (p > 0.05).Nonetheless, there is a statistically significant interaction effect between temperature and reduction ratio (p < 0.05), indicating that the reduction ratio's impact depends on the temperature.This suggests that the combined effect of these factors is more than the sum of their individual effects.
By utilizing the data in Fig. 6B, and following the same procedure (ANOVA) done in Table 5, the F-values of columns, rows, and interaction turn out to be 3.55, 15.04 and 0.88, respectively.The P-values calculated from these F-statistics are 0.05016, 0.00014 and 0.43189.These values provide, with 95% confidence, that the ultimate strength of the extruded material is influenced by both the extrusion temperature (p < 0.05) and reduction ratio (p = 0.05), but there appears to be no interaction effect between them (p > 0.05).This suggests that the effect of one factor on the dependent variable is not dependent on the other factor, and their impact is consistent across all levels of the other factor.As a result, the two factors are operating independently, and their combined effect on the dependent variable is simply the sum of their individual effects.

Linear multiple regression analysis
Another method to analyze the relationship between strength of the extrudate "dependent variable" and extrusion temperature and reduction ratio "independent variables" is linear multiple regression (LMR) analysis.The goal of the analysis is to create a linear equation that can be used to predict the value of the dependent variable based on the values of the independent variables.
In linear multiple regression analysis, the relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variables is assumed to be linear.The analysis estimates the coefficients of the linear equation using a set of observed data points, with the goal of minimizing the differences (error) between the predicted values and the actual values of the dependent variable.In order to validate the data analysis, correlation coefficients (R σ,T and R σ,R ) and coefficient of determination (R 2 ) have to be calculated first.Correlation coefficients measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the dependent variable and each of the independent variables, while the coefficient of determination is a measure of the proportion of the total variation in the dependent variable that is explained by the independent variables in the regression model.
Following the abovementioned formulae, the linear regression equations (plotted in Figs. 8 and 9) for theoretical yield and ultimate strengths are:  www.nature.com/scientificreports/Both yield and ultimate tensile strength models exhibit negative relationships between the independent variables and the dependent variable, signifying that as either variable increases, the tensile strength tends to decrease.The second independent variable has a much stronger association with yield strength, as evidenced by its higher correlation coefficient, implying a clearer influence on its variation.Similarly, for ultimate tensile strength, the second variable shows a stronger association, although the overall correlation coefficients are weaker.
While the coefficient of determination suggests a moderate ability of the yield strength model to explain the dependent variable, there's still a significant portion of unexplained variance.This hints at potential limitations of the model or the presence of other contributing factors not included in the analysis.The lower coefficient of determination for the ultimate tensile strength model further emphasizes this, highlighting the need for further investigation into potentially missing factors or model refinement.
Figures 8 and 9 illustrate that the highest yield and ultimate tensile strengths, 105.06 MPa and 166.07 MPa, are optimally reached with an extrusion temperature of 350°C and a reduction ratio of 6.
In the previous section, ANOVA analysis revealed that both temperature and reduction ratio significantly affect ultimate strength, while only temperature impacts yield strength.Using this in the linear regression models, it is revealed that a 36% increase in reduction ratio combined with a 20% increase in temperature yielded a proportional decrease of 2% in ultimate strength.Similarly, a 20% increase in temperature alone resulted in a 9% proportional decrease in yield strength.

Density
Every sample representing different extrusion conditions was evaluated using an analytical balance density determination kit.The outcomes of these evaluations are presented in Table 6.The table displays how the density of each specimen is slightly lower than the parent material, which is reasonable due to the possibility of voids and impurities during the compaction and extrusion processes.
Two analytical methods were used to examine each value.The first approach was the ANOVA method, which was also used to investigate the tensile test outcomes.It aimed to determine the importance of each variable separately and its interaction with the variation between each value and that of the parent material.The second method employed was the linear multiple regression analysis, which involved calculating both correlation and determination coefficients (R & R 2 ) to evaluate the strength, direction, and quality of the connection between the extrusion conditions (independent variables) and the density values.The results for each method are shown in Table 7.
According to the findings presented above, it can be concluded that neither the individual variables nor their interaction have a significant impact on the density value of the extruded material.This is because all MSR values are lower than their corresponding minimum values.Moreover, the correlation and determination coefficients did not approach either + 1 or − 1, indicating a weak or nonexistent linear relationship between the extrusion variables and the density values.This could be due to two potential reasons:

Microstructure
In the microstructure analysis phase, as shown in Fig. 10, it was clearly observed that as both reduction ratio and extrusion temperature increase, the sample's grain size increases, while the grain boundaries and voids intensity decreases; giving a visually more similar structure to that of the parent material (Specimen code: 0B).

Conclusion
This study aimed to determine the optimal operating and forming factors for recycled aluminum material, evaluate the effect of direct hot extrusion on improving the material properties, and identify the optimal conditions for the direct hot extrusion process.The experimental work included selecting the aluminum alloy material, conducting mechanical and metallurgical tests on the original material, extracting the chips using a selected operation, turning the raw material at different depths, compressing the chips into blocks, and then hot extruding the blocks into the desired cross-sectional shapes.The final product's properties were compared with those of the original material.Through investigation, the following conclusions have been made: • Microstructural analysis showed that it would be beneficial to increase both extrusion reduction ratio and temperature (within the capabilities of the material and machines used) in order to obtain a product with a more stable and uniform structure.• It has been discovered, through ANOVA analysis, increasing both extrusion reduction ratio and temperature would only be beneficial in case the recycled material is to be used in metal-forming applications.• If the recycled material is to be used in applications which only require elastic deformation, the main focus should only be on increasing the extrusion temperature, as the yield strength of the recycled material is not significantly impacted by the extrusion reduction ratio.• Implementing those findings into the linear multiple regression (LMR) models, it is found that increasing both reduction ratio (36%) and temperature (20%) leads to a slight decrease in ultimate strength (2%), while higher temperature alone (20%) reduces yield strength more significantly (9%).
Vol , respectively.• Based on both ANOVA and LMR analyses, it's clear that the extrusion temperature and reduction ratio, both individually and combined, do not significantly affect the material's extruded density.This is potentially due to the combined effects of subtle variations in trace element impurities and a limited range of influential change in density caused by the extrusion parameter values used in the study.• Microstructure results show that high extrusion temperature and reduction ratio result in better mechanical properties, while tensile test results and ANOVA show that low extrusion temperature and reduction ratio result in better mechanical properties.Such contradiction can only be explained due to the fact that at high temperatures, the material has undergone a similar process to annealing, which led to decreasing its overall mechanical properties.
Overall, the study provides insights into the potential of direct hot extrusion as a method for recycling aluminum chips and identifies the optimal operating conditions for producing high-quality recycled aluminum material.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Aluminum alloy 6082 chips formed via machine turning process at different depths of cut 'a'-(A) a = 0.5 mm, continuous chips; (B) a = 1 mm, curled or easily broken chips; (C) a = 1.5 mm, very small broken chips.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Compaction of Aluminum chips-(A) Compacted billed; (B) Average dimensions for the nine billets compacted during this study; (C) Detailed schematic of the designed and manufactured compaction/extrusion die and container.

Figure 3 .Table 3 .
Figure 3. Direct hot extrusion of compacted aluminum chip billets-(A) Detailed schematic of the extrusion process; (B) High-chrome tool steel (BÖHLER W302) die for circular profile extrusion.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Hot extruded rods "Extrudates"-(A) Extrusion piping defect; (B) Die swell defect; (C) Extrudate rods after being separated from their dead-metal zones and labeled from 1 to 10.Each label represents a specific parametric combination of the extrusion conditions, except for No. 7, which was eliminated due to an experimental mishap.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Histograms showing yield strength (A) and ultimate strength (B) of each tensile sample representing every combination between the values of extrusion temperature and reduction ratio.

Figure 7 .Table 5 . 2 N 2 N
Figure 7. Histograms showing yield strain (A) and ultimate strain (B) of each tensile sample representing every combination between the values of extrusion temperature and reduction ratio.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Regression lines representing theoretical yield strengths plotted against actual measured points and the errors between them (red dashed lines).

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Regression lines representing theoretical ultimate strengths plotted against actual measured points and the errors between them (red dashed lines).

Table 1 .
12emical compositions of the Aluminum alloy to be recycled (parent material) and standard Aluminum alloy.*Chemicalcompositionmeasured using an optical emission spectrometer (OES).**Standardchemicalcomposition as per to The Aluminum Association registration records12.

Table 2 .
Tool angles (A) and cutting parameters (B) for HSS turning tools.

Table 6 .
Density values of each extrudate representing every variable combination.*Density value of the parent material

Table 7 .
Density Variations in unseen trace elements, even within acceptable ranges, could influence density through differing atomic weights and packing efficiencies, potentially masking the subtle impact of extrusion parameters.•Limited range of influence: If the extrusion parametric variations used in the study did not cause a large enough change in density, the ANOVA and regression analyses might not have had enough data to detect a statistically significant effect.